Page 1 of 3

Polikarpov PO-2

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:50 pm
by Monz
This will be for next year's Indoor Scale Nats' Open Rubber class. I bought the Flying Scale Models plan that was in the Jan 2004 issue, which at 24th scale is 18" span. That's a bit small, so I doubled it!

Mike Stuart flew a beautiful 30" span De Havilland Fox Moth to first place this year in Open Rubber, and with my DVII in Kit Scale, the large and light equals slow and realistic formula was proven. I think we will be seeing many more larger and lighter models competing indoors in the future.

I've not decided yet whether I'll be modelling the Shuttleworth or Weeks PO-2, I have great colour documentation for both so will probably decide later on in the build.

I must thank Peter Fardell for lending me his books for this build.

Image

Re: Polikarpov PO-2

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:53 pm
by Monz
Looking over the various references I have and comparing them to the plan, the plan is inaccurate. Surprise! I spent some time drawing the corrections onto the plan with a cold one.

Image

Re: Polikarpov PO-2

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:57 pm
by Monz
Managed a bit this evening after work. As the plan is doubled, I'm doubling only certain areas. The original 18" span called for 1/16th sheet sides, I've gone with the same size on mine. The fuselage stringers are 1/8th. I plan to use the wood sparingly where I can to have some weight in the bank for detailing. Little things like aluminium sheet panels ;)

Image

Re: Polikarpov PO-2

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 10:16 pm
by g_kandylakis
Great to see you here again Monique !

Looking like an interesting build. You are right aboth the light /slow models. wish you every success and will be watching for more progress reports...

George

Re: Polikarpov PO-2

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2016 9:30 am
by oldgit
Monz,

Why not use 1/16th stringers?
That way you can use 4 times as many for a given volume or is it that you require the extra rigidity that 1/8th section would provide for your model?

Eagerly awaiting the next instalment of the build.

Roger

Re: Polikarpov PO-2

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2016 10:13 am
by Monz
Hi George, good to see you here too. Look forward to seeing your builds.

Hi Roger, I fear 1/16th would be too small on the fuselage for this size model.

Re: Polikarpov PO-2

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:25 pm
by Pete Fardell
Hi Monz- great to see you posting on here. I shall really enjoy following this! I read on another forum (where I've been lurking a bit) that you heard Kevin Wallace state that he'd never seen a model PO2 fly well. I really can't believe there is any reason why it won't though. At 36" inch span I reckon yours will need nailing down to stop it being a real performer!

Here's the video Tim took of my 18" as-plan version, at Nottingham a few years ago.
https://youtu.be/HOai4JE8ufs
It flies quite well for a little while at least!
It's not had a great record indoors, with either the walls or the takeoff usually foiling it but I always feel it's got potential. I'm going to try it outdoors for the first time at Port Meadow tomorrow. I'm not sure if it will cope, but at any rate they'll be no ROG required and no brick walls either!

Re: Polikarpov PO-2

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 7:44 pm
by RussLista
Made it on here at last (though I have been a member since 2004 I suppose) .... I also will follow this one with interest.
Good to see you on a forum again.

Re: Polikarpov PO-2

Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 8:36 pm
by Monz
Hey Russ! SFA was my free flight home, so I hope we can all get it back to where it was.

Slow progress on this. Spent some time today getting the fuselage cross members and formers in. Hope to get the 1/32nd sheet decking on tonight. I really need to get cracking on this to have it ready for April...

I'm finding the plan to be very inconsistent, so it's taking time to get the plan bits to match the three view. My next few models will be OD's!

Image

Image

Image

Re: Polikarpov PO-2

Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 9:41 pm
by g_kandylakis
Looking forward to your progress, Monique.

I agree with Russ, it is good to have you in a forum.
You are inspiring us to try and catch up with your pace...

George