SAAB Fighter

Find out what our readers have on their building boards

Moderator: staubkorb

User avatar
staubkorb
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:35 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

SAAB Fighter

Postby staubkorb » Thu Mar 07, 2019 7:29 pm

An aircraft that has long intrigued me is the SAAB J/A 21 pusher fighter that was further developed into Sweden's first jet fighter. I was aware that Pres Bruning had built a rubber powered version sometime around 2004 and wrote to him if a plan was available ( assumed it was his design). A few weeks later I received a letter with a tiled print of the hand drawn (sketched!) plan by none other than the late great Nate Sturman!

The scan was/is fair/good, but the penciled in notations were all but illegible and masked some critical areas of the drawing so I re-scanned and loaded the pages into my TurboCad 4 (!) and started to redraw and stitch the tiles together.

Fast forward to last month, I completed a rough drawing (going thru TC4, v8, then v12.5 and finally v21) to what I hope will work for a viable model. I'm presently cutting wood.
220px-J-21-Intro.jpg
220px-J-21-Intro.jpg (6.53 KiB) Viewed 1604 times


Scale is 1/24th which translates to about a 19 inch span, assuming my scaling didn't go AWOL, makes a lot of the parts quite finicky. If it all works out, I'll probably go to 3/4" inch/foot scale for a span of 28 inches.
Attachments
300px-Saab_J_21A-3.jpg
300px-Saab_J_21A-3.jpg (18.53 KiB) Viewed 1604 times
220px-SAABA21A-3Soderhamn.jpg
220px-SAABA21A-3Soderhamn.jpg (12.32 KiB) Viewed 1604 times
Comparing Spammers to a pile of organic waste is an insult to the organic waste!

kittyfritters
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 8:13 pm

Re: SAAB Fighter

Postby kittyfritters » Fri Mar 08, 2019 12:14 am

Personally, I would go for 1:16 scale. It would be structurally less dense, have more wing area, a longer motor and likely be easier to trim. But, that's my view. It will be interesting watching how yours develops.

KF
Ubi sublata omnia praecepta legis

User avatar
staubkorb
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:35 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: SAAB Fighter

Postby staubkorb » Sat Mar 09, 2019 3:18 pm

A fair idea, Howard! Bigger does generally fly better. 1:16 would put it at about 30 inches (I'm lousy at converting these scales even tho I studied aircraft design :oops: ).

I've started building the easy parts - stab and rudders - to let them fully "cure" as I've found that letting the flat gubbins age a bit helps reduce warpage (assuming the joints are square). Fairly slow going atm as I'm fighting a bad cold.
Comparing Spammers to a pile of organic waste is an insult to the organic waste!

User avatar
staubkorb
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:35 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: SAAB Fighter

Postby staubkorb » Sun Mar 10, 2019 6:36 pm

Here are photos of the prelim plan that I'm using to check the buildability of this puppy.
Attachments
2019_03100049.jpg
2019_03100049.jpg (163.46 KiB) Viewed 1531 times
2019_03100048.jpg
2019_03100048.jpg (152.55 KiB) Viewed 1531 times
2019_03100047.jpg
2019_03100047.jpg (153.04 KiB) Viewed 1531 times
Comparing Spammers to a pile of organic waste is an insult to the organic waste!

User avatar
staubkorb
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:35 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: SAAB Fighter

Postby staubkorb » Sun Mar 24, 2019 2:45 pm

Started gluing up one of the booms and the fuselage to check parts fit and found a few areas that need adjustment - a couple of formers are a bit too short. Lot of work in this puppy, but otherwise is shaping up well. Pictures soon.
Comparing Spammers to a pile of organic waste is an insult to the organic waste!

User avatar
staubkorb
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:35 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: SAAB Fighter

Postby staubkorb » Mon Mar 25, 2019 3:38 pm

Slow work due to too many other projects, but here are two pics. The "issues" with fitting are more to do with poor cutting - on these smaller models, a half millimeter makes a BIG difference! The one fuselage former (F3) was traced from the original hand drawing and I neglected to check the dimensions with the fuselage side-view :oops: . The rest are within tolerance (but not for laser cutting - have to work on that...).
Attachments
2019_03250005.jpg
2019_03250005.jpg (125.84 KiB) Viewed 908 times
2019_03250004.jpg
2019_03250004.jpg (142.75 KiB) Viewed 908 times
Comparing Spammers to a pile of organic waste is an insult to the organic waste!

User avatar
staubkorb
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:35 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: SAAB Fighter

Postby staubkorb » Sun Mar 31, 2019 11:30 am

Slow going (as usual for me :| ), but cutting, test fitting, modifying and adjusting takes its toll.

A number of the stringer notches as drawn in the rough plan were off quite a bit plus the two height errors on formers 3 and 4. The only notches that I pre-cut were on the nose former (the others were simply marked) and I used the string plumb method to get the rest to line up. The string is visible in the photos.

Three stringers still need to be added - One on the upper rear and two lower forward.

Haven't made up my mind whether I'll incorporate a plug-in landing gear...
Attachments
2019_03300006.jpg
2019_03300006.jpg (174.29 KiB) Viewed 788 times
2019_03300007.jpg
2019_03300007.jpg (188.11 KiB) Viewed 788 times
Comparing Spammers to a pile of organic waste is an insult to the organic waste!

Sky9pilot
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2016 9:53 pm

Re: SAAB Fighter

Postby Sky9pilot » Sun Mar 31, 2019 9:10 pm

Love this plane Pete...I look forward to your progress. Hope you make the plan available when you get it all finalized. I'll have to add it to my "To Do List"!!!

uhu
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2016 7:32 pm

Re: SAAB Fighter

Postby uhu » Mon Apr 01, 2019 12:21 pm

impressive plane, and nice build too!

User avatar
staubkorb
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:35 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: SAAB Fighter

Postby staubkorb » Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:17 pm

The majority of the fuselage and one boom is done plus the horz. stab. One thing about twin-boomed aircraft is the necessity of building essentially THREE fuselages :| . Weights are, at present, quite reasonable.

I've a lot of modifying on the plan to do that would have been obvious had I been even halfway proficient with 3D CAD - will be working on that next.
Comparing Spammers to a pile of organic waste is an insult to the organic waste!


Return to “Construction Projects”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest